Clues and patterns… - One of the fringe Scientists there at that company once said something to me that I have remembered ever since. It affected my thinking in ways I still apply in my work today. He was a man that had retired, but was healing from a bad leg break before leaving to Spain. Trying to find something to do, he would spend some days at that Oxygen Analyzer company dabbling in a new product they were developing that was going to be a CO2 analyzer based on infrared light, as infrared is absorbed by CO2. He was working on a potential gas flow sensor design for it and was using a manomiter to see if the design might have some “Venturi Effects” that might be trouble. He couldn’t see the water level easily during testing so since we didn’t have any colored water, he added coffee to it so he could see it better from a distance. I was curious what he was doing when I saw him pouring his morning coffee into one of the tubes. So I asked him if it was possible that the coffee might outgas of sorts to interfere with the rest of the testing’s? And he said, nope, just working on the sensor flow characterizes at this point. He called it the “Coffee Manomiter” - lol.
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com
ffice
ffice" /><o
></o
>
Anyway, one day he said that he had been recently hired by a cancer research company to look into why their cancer culture experiments (or whatever they are called) were not going well. As the cultures were giving erratic results and there was no consistency in the experiments due to the cancer cells they wanted to do experiments on were not growing consistently. So he determined that the room lights were affecting the cancer culture cells. And now they were asking him what would be the best way to go about shielding the cancer cultures from the various light sources. And what he said next is what I have always remembered:
<o
></o
>
He said in effect, “So I said to them, it seems to me that you are asking the wrong question. Instead of asking how can we grow the cancer cultures better, shouldn’t you be asking the question: Why are the lights killing the cancer cells?”
<o
></o
>
He said he tried to get them interested in that approach but no one was even remotely interested. And he was baffled and actually a bit appalled at their disinterest in that obvious fact. He kept saying that he couldn’t get even remote interest from them in that fact. Not necessarily that lights will cure cancer, but perhaps if they looked into it more, they might find out what it is in the atmosphere of lights that doesn’t allow that cancer type to survive very well. It was that type of thinking he was trying to get them interested in. But they were not even the least bit interested, and he was bothered by their attitude about it.
<o
></o
>
I’m not so sure I thought a lot along those lines before he said that, but it was like the “lights” went on for me about what he was saying. It is kind of like: Can you help us cut down all these trees that are in the way of our trying to find the forest? – That old saying “Can’t see the forest because all the trees are in the way.”
<o
></o
>
Just because almost everyone says: something must be done a certain way, or it is always done like this, or my job only involves this part here, doesn’t mean that is the best way to do something to benefit others, or will reveal the truth or the right answers.
<o
></o
>
Like the guy who invented the microwave for cooking food. He was working on the early radar during WWII I think, and he noticed that the chocolate in his pocket melted when he was near the radar when it was on. If he had then asked himself something like: How can I keep the chocolate in the room from melting when the radar is on? we might never have had the microwave to cook our food. But he instead asked a different question from what he observed, and many people have benefitted from it since.
<o
></o
>
Seems a lot of things are like that. I certainly have been blessed to be able to have done something like 25,000 to 30,000 machinery repairs in my business over the past 25 years. I have had to apply what that Scientist said all the time or I won’t see the “truth and facts” of what is really going on when I am trying to diagnose a problem. It is easy to get diverted away from solving the problem, as many irrelevant things will tend to look like the cause or the way to solve the problem, but they are not. But they sure seem like they are at first. And paying attention to the irrelevant and not the bottom line on things, is a quick way to go broke when self employed. Perhaps only bureaucracies and non-profits can ignore the bottom line and “the truth” of what is really going on, and instead focus on everything else. But for those willing to look at the clues and patterns, much might be discovered when taking time to investigate where that leads.
<o
></o
>
Here is another clue and pattern I just noticed today! – When a person’s hair starts to fall out, they start to reminisce and turn into a Story Teller - lol. I just finished my morning coffee, so back to work for me now.
<o
></o
>