Jon von der Heyden
MrExcel MVP, Moderator
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2004
- Messages
- 10,912
- Office Version
- 365
- Platform
- Windows
Yes, I definitely think they have a purpose. Emma has just described one. Another example is to demonstrate sales v. sales volume, obviously depending on what is being sold. These can for instance describe increased sales through increased sales volumes, or perhaps increased sales due to increased product pricing.Last year my boss looked at me as if I had two heads because I'd never used a second Y axis. Anyone here ever used one?
It's a tricky subjecct to present. Well I think so. A few of points I'm throwing in:I've been thinking about misleading data (rather than graphs). I think most of the stuff that I see (and produce!) is to do with poor labelling, not updating text when the data changes, assumptions not clearly noted etc. Probably not the sort of stuff you want for a presentation!
1. Pivot Data is more reliable. I will go on to demonstrate how efficient pivot tables can be. Most of my colleagues and our management are not aware of things such as calculated items/fields, show pages, date grouping etc.
2. Where formula are used, and where they contain names, a list of all names and their corresponding formulae should always be presented, with a brief description toward the purpose of each. I will demonstrate how VBA can be quickly used to ptoduce the list.
3. Summaries and raw data should be contained in independent sheets. This may make it easier to validate and also minimises opportunities to (accidentally) corrupt the data.
Last edited: