I think frustration and anger are inevitable in such circusmtances. But what could I do - in reality? I can't get in a car and drive to NO to help. I would be someone in the way. I can send money to Red Cross, which is very good (and our family is doing that). But that doesn't translate into water bottles today in NO, Biloxi, Gulfport, or anywhere else.
And I am not a government apologist, but sometimes even with the best of planning, some things cannot be done immediately. Reminds me of a VP recently who wanted something done. I told him that it couldn't be done in the time period set. Even if we had all the programmers/database experts in the world available, it wouldn't change the time needed for the specific task. Should the Corps of Engineers been better prepared? Sure. Could some things have been down differently? Yep. But once the disaster hits, there is another reality that intrudes - and it isn't a "government problem" it has to do with the physical realities of distance, capabilities, etc. Yes, buses are needed. But to get buses there requires support, and even if they could get through, who would insure that they could get gas once they made it through? And many of the people need water worse than getting out of the immediate circumstances.
So, I have heard comments like "Well, we can airlift water/food to Iraq but we can't do it here for our own people!" The reality is that the mechanism to supply water/food to Iraq took a long time to establish it. It didn't happen in a week, and the amount of water/food aid given in Iraq is insignificant compared to what is needed in this disaster. And it isn't just NO that needs the immediate help. There are several towns of 5,000-10,000 people who have no town, no access to any kind of relief, no access to major highways. So they tend to be forgotten along with Gulport, Biloxi, etc. because of the attention on NO.
And the death toll continues, which deepens the sadness of the disaster. There are no easy answers, and that is frustrating...