Predict The Output III

[Colin Legg]

Re: Predict The Output II

It's been switched over to a private poll. I think it reset the votes so anyone who had already voted might have to re-vote.

 

[RoryA]

Re: Predict The Output II

The 0 option seems to be missing too.

 

[Colin Legg]

Re: Predict The Output II

Hi Richard,

Two people had voted 0 which isn't a choice on the poll anymore.

Cheers

 

[Richard Schollar]

Re: Predict The Output II

For some weird reason it won't accept '0' as a poll question when it's a private poll so I've replaced with Zero. All scores have been zeroed out I'm afraid.

 

[cornflakegirl]

Re: Predict The Output II

I don't get the code. And I don't get Rory's jokes. Feel thick now!

 

[RoryA]

Re: Predict The Output II

And I don't get Rory's jokes. Feel thick now!

You should feel happy about that part.

 

[cornflakegirl]

Re: Predict The Output II

But your jokes are normally funny. In a dad way

 

[RoryA]

Re: Predict The Output II

That reminds me - when are you due to pop?

 

[cornflakegirl]

Re: Predict The Output II

Couple of months. If it doesn't claw its way out first. (Having particularly uncomfortable day today! )

 

[Greg Truby]

Re: Predict The Output II

The first two didn't cause me any problems. But the NOT 2 bucked off and into the dirt. Completely didn't expect that one. What I had expected to see would more or less have been the same as

? not(cbool(2)) + 0

I still ain't quite sure of the logic on that one. I understand arithmatically what it's doing. But I don't get why MS would program it to behave like that.