OSU Vs. UM

[Jon von der Heyden]

Rugby is for sissies (j/k)

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :x !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Richard Schollar]

Quote:
Rugby is for sissies (j/k)


!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Mad !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

He didn't mean rugby players in general - he just meant you, Baron

 

[Jon von der Heyden]

Any more comments like that and the Baron's gonna take you up for a full aerobatics demonstration!!! You won't be a BFG anymore, you'll turn into a green ogre!!!

 

[Oorang]

Any more comments like that and the Baron's gonna take you up for a full aerobatics demonstration!!! You won't be a BFG anymore, you'll turn into a green ogre!!!

lol Totaly worth it

Great Game! May have to play it again, but great game. I would not want to be Llyod Carr if he losses twice.

 

[TinaP]

I don't think they should play again, although the BCS may decide otherwise. UM had their chance. It was a great game.

 

[Mark O'Brien]

It was a good game, just a bad result.

If the ranking system throws up a rematch for the National Championship then so be it. That's the rules of the game, no matter how retarded.

EDIT: Playoffs! That's the answer. The top 8 play in a knock out tournament. It only adds two extra games on to the season for the winner and runnerup. 1 vs 8, 2 vs 7, 3 vs 6, 4 vs 5. The winners play again in a semi and then again in a final. See? It takes a foreigner to improve your flawed systems.

 

[Joe4]

I don't think they should play again, although the BCS may decide otherwise. UM had their chance. It was a great game.

Yes, but it would be pretty interesting to see what the result would have been if the game was played in Michigan or a "neutral" location.

If Ohio State really thinks they are better, they won't be afraid to face them again...


P.S. I agree with Mark, I think a playoff system (like March Madness) would be better than the stupid BCS. The issue is money and the college presidents unwillingness to change.

 

[Mark O'Brien]

I was about to post that OSU has a better Bowl record over the last few years than Michigan so OSU should have even less to worry about. Then I checked their overall Bowl records. They've both got an 18-19 record. That's interesting. (to me)

 

[Smitty]

What's weird is that Ohio's winning lottery numbers for the night were:

4-1-3-9.

(Or so the news reported).

Smitty

 

[Oorang]

Also Michigian took two injuries in that game so could be playing with a shorter roster for the rematch.