Greg Truby
MrExcel MVP
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2002
- Messages
- 10,030
I realize that to the regulars here, I'm sure this is a sign of the apocalypse – me actually re-tracking a thread back on course for however brief of a span…
The only times I have *ever* used merged cells in a workbook I was building have been to create an Excel version of US gov't forms or shipping label-type output. I was able to build forms that looked so much like the originals that the gov't officials we were collaborating with could not tell the difference between mine and the PDF version printed from the internet.
Having Excel versions made workflow better as I was able to use validation & VBA to boost productivity. Aside from this type of application (needing a specific layout like forms or labels), I have never found merged cells' PITA overhead to outweigh any possible benefit.
IMHO, if the worksheet is intended for actual number crunching, merged cells are just plain bad voodoo.
OK – Emma, Richard, there’s your cue: “voodoo”, what can you do with that?
The only times I have *ever* used merged cells in a workbook I was building have been to create an Excel version of US gov't forms or shipping label-type output. I was able to build forms that looked so much like the originals that the gov't officials we were collaborating with could not tell the difference between mine and the PDF version printed from the internet.
Having Excel versions made workflow better as I was able to use validation & VBA to boost productivity. Aside from this type of application (needing a specific layout like forms or labels), I have never found merged cells' PITA overhead to outweigh any possible benefit.
IMHO, if the worksheet is intended for actual number crunching, merged cells are just plain bad voodoo.
OK – Emma, Richard, there’s your cue: “voodoo”, what can you do with that?