I've tried my best to search herein and review Jon Peltier's website and can't find what I'm looking for. Please help.
I have a straightforward line chart trending monthly spend rates by month over a year. Spend rates are in the tens of millions. The chart works well enough and the scale works fine. However, in full numeric resolution, the y-axis simply has too many digits of resolution; at $13,500,000, anything below the "13.5m" level really doesn't matter (much).
I tried to address it simply by dividing the values to get down to the right level, i.e., "13.5" and put some text in the chart title to indicate the $ are in Millions (000,000s) but that doesn't suit the readers. They would like to see the scale read in "$##.#m" format. How can I get the numberic scale right but somehow prefix the number with a $ sign and suffix the number with an "m" to denote millions and still have the scaling function work normally, i.e., some sort of dynamic scale?
I have a straightforward line chart trending monthly spend rates by month over a year. Spend rates are in the tens of millions. The chart works well enough and the scale works fine. However, in full numeric resolution, the y-axis simply has too many digits of resolution; at $13,500,000, anything below the "13.5m" level really doesn't matter (much).
I tried to address it simply by dividing the values to get down to the right level, i.e., "13.5" and put some text in the chart title to indicate the $ are in Millions (000,000s) but that doesn't suit the readers. They would like to see the scale read in "$##.#m" format. How can I get the numberic scale right but somehow prefix the number with a $ sign and suffix the number with an "m" to denote millions and still have the scaling function work normally, i.e., some sort of dynamic scale?