username_rand
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2019
- Messages
- 20
Hi, i am working on a new employee performance evaluation form. Managers will fill the form for each of their employees semi-annually (attached). Each employee should have a minimum of 5 objectives and a maximum of 10 per each 6-month period. In the old evaluation form, each objective had a weight (out of 100%) in order to ensure fairness and accuracy of the evaluation, so if the manager entered 6 objectives, they would have to assign a weight to each objective ensuring that the total sum of the weights is 100%. Now we want to follow this same approach but instead of actual weights, managers have to enter Priorities (in wording) but each of these priorities represent a weight that we as the creators of the form know but managers & other employees don't. Priorities and their meaning are as follows:
1. Very High = 20%
2. High = 15%
3. Medium = 10%
4. Low = 5%
the issue here is how can we make sure that priorities chosen by the managers always end up being 100% in terms of weight, never more and never less, to ensure the results are accurate? and how to ensure that whether the number of objectives is 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10, that there are constraints to how many times managers can assign these priorities all in relevance to the weights they represent.
1. Very High = 20%
2. High = 15%
3. Medium = 10%
4. Low = 5%
the issue here is how can we make sure that priorities chosen by the managers always end up being 100% in terms of weight, never more and never less, to ensure the results are accurate? and how to ensure that whether the number of objectives is 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10, that there are constraints to how many times managers can assign these priorities all in relevance to the weights they represent.