Hi,
Has any one carried out any analysis on the performance of the 2 over a large dataset? I'm optimising a workbook and wondering which performs better, a SUMIF with a helper column, or SUMIFS direct to the columns?
Thanks
Yes, you are right on my not so clear clarity
I meant to say how the performance compares on a multiple criteria basis. In 2003 I would concatenate the 2 or more columns. In 2007 a straight sumifs on the columns is substituted, but wondering does this actually better performance?
Thanks
Edit: In fact jonmo explains it better than me Be interesting to know if anyone had done any actual testing.