RandyJseatac
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2011
- Messages
- 8
We have about 200 rows of data. Each row is a day.
Column A values come from other formulas on that row.
Column A values range from 0 to 20
Each new entry in column A contributes "1" to the total in column B for each row until it (A) has decremented to 0.
Each entry in column A should decline by one on each of the rows that follow (each passing day)
Yep, the A's overlap sometimes.
An example may illustrate better:
Column B is the correct answer (manually). My question is how do I program that?
Column B is a running total of how many Simultaneous A's are currently "active" on that particular day (row)
Thanks for any help! It's been a head-scratcher for days.
3 1
3 2
3 3
0 2
0 1
0 0
9 1
0 1
2* 2
0 2
4 2 <- on this row, the 4 adds one, the 2* gets to zero, and the 9 has 5 rows left before it is zero
0 2
1 3
Note: the results do not need to be on the same rows as the data. Bottom line is that I'm looking for the maximum simultaneous A's. -- "3" in this case
Column A values come from other formulas on that row.
Column A values range from 0 to 20
Each new entry in column A contributes "1" to the total in column B for each row until it (A) has decremented to 0.
Each entry in column A should decline by one on each of the rows that follow (each passing day)
Yep, the A's overlap sometimes.
An example may illustrate better:
Column B is the correct answer (manually). My question is how do I program that?
Column B is a running total of how many Simultaneous A's are currently "active" on that particular day (row)
Thanks for any help! It's been a head-scratcher for days.
3 1
3 2
3 3
0 2
0 1
0 0
9 1
0 1
2* 2
0 2
4 2 <- on this row, the 4 adds one, the 2* gets to zero, and the 9 has 5 rows left before it is zero
0 2
1 3
Note: the results do not need to be on the same rows as the data. Bottom line is that I'm looking for the maximum simultaneous A's. -- "3" in this case