drmweaver2
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2016
- Messages
- 9
I'm sure this is such a basic question that some of you will laugh, so please "be gentle"... Lol
Okay, here's the deal. I am designing a system where 2 different tables (Item, Accessory) will have a field with one of the same 8 "condition values" and only one of those 8 "condition values" (ex., Factory New, Excellent, Good...).
Is it better to make 1 table with the 8 conditions in it (ConditionID, ConditionValue) and make a relationship between the Condition table and the 2 other tables or simply incorporate the Condition Values in a "pull down" on a form?
Would the answer be different if there are more than 3 similar situations? That is, assume I'm tracking Condition, Status & Finish for entries in Weapon, Accessory and RangeEquipment tables, for example?
What is a "reasonable cutoff" where it's more efficient to just stick the limited number of restricted values in a form as opposed to keeping a number of small tables and creating relationships between all of them and the various "larger"/main tables?
Okay, here's the deal. I am designing a system where 2 different tables (Item, Accessory) will have a field with one of the same 8 "condition values" and only one of those 8 "condition values" (ex., Factory New, Excellent, Good...).
Is it better to make 1 table with the 8 conditions in it (ConditionID, ConditionValue) and make a relationship between the Condition table and the 2 other tables or simply incorporate the Condition Values in a "pull down" on a form?
Would the answer be different if there are more than 3 similar situations? That is, assume I'm tracking Condition, Status & Finish for entries in Weapon, Accessory and RangeEquipment tables, for example?
What is a "reasonable cutoff" where it's more efficient to just stick the limited number of restricted values in a form as opposed to keeping a number of small tables and creating relationships between all of them and the various "larger"/main tables?