Goal Seek Bug

AddisonScott

New Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2017
Messages
3
Goal Seek is not working correctly for me for some reason.

For example, take the three cells: A1, B1, C1.

C1 = A1 + B1

A1 = 1

Now, I start Goal Seek and use the following information:

Set: C1

To value: 8

By changing: B1

Instead of Goal Seek changing B1 to 7 (1 + 7 = 8), I get the following:

A1 = 1 (good, nothing changed)

B1 = 2.02 (this is a problem)

C1 = 8 (this would be OK, except that it is manually typed in!, my formula of C1 = A1 + B1 is gone!)

I checked that I have "Enable iterative calculation" turned on and my "Maximum Change" is set to 0.001.

I'd appreciate any insight into fixing this problem.

Thanks!

Below is a link to a GIF of the problem.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qBf_VsJOIvutb5p4EIcSdv6kUt7AsZYp/view?usp=sharing
 

Excel Facts

Copy formula down without changing references
If you have =SUM(F2:F49) in F50; type Alt+' in F51 to copy =SUM(F2:F49) to F51, leaving the formula in edit mode. Change SUM to COUNT.
C1 = 8 (this would be OK, except that it is manually typed in!, my formula of C1 = A1 + B1 is gone!)

Works fine for me with Excel 2010.

But in other forums, people have a reported a similar problem (the Set Cell formula is replaced) using Excel 2016 -- I think the version in subscription Office 365, not the standalone Excel 2016.

I checked that I have "Enable iterative calculation" turned on

Not a good idea, if you don't need it. (And you almost never do.) Setting this option disables the circular reference check, which is much more useful, in general, than relying on circular reference by design or increasing "what if" iterations.
 
Upvote 0
Thanks joeu2004.

Yes, I will turn off iterative calculations. I only turned it on because several other help pages I found suggested the problem was with that or with the Maximum Change.

The version of Excel I'm using is Microsoft Office Professional Plus 2013.
 
Upvote 0
I will turn off iterative calculations. I only turned it on because several other help pages I found suggested the problem was with that or with the Maximum Change.

Obviously, not __this__ problem (__replacing__ the target formula). Increasing the number of iterations and the precision of max change might improve the approximate result. But so does clicking Goal Seek two or more times without changing the result from the previous Goal Seek. Not worth the risk of ignoring circular references, IMHO.
 
Upvote 0

Forum statistics

Threads
1,223,704
Messages
6,173,984
Members
452,540
Latest member
haasro02

We've detected that you are using an adblocker.

We have a great community of people providing Excel help here, but the hosting costs are enormous. You can help keep this site running by allowing ads on MrExcel.com.
Allow Ads at MrExcel

Which adblocker are you using?

Disable AdBlock

Follow these easy steps to disable AdBlock

1)Click on the icon in the browser’s toolbar.
2)Click on the icon in the browser’s toolbar.
2)Click on the "Pause on this site" option.
Go back

Disable AdBlock Plus

Follow these easy steps to disable AdBlock Plus

1)Click on the icon in the browser’s toolbar.
2)Click on the toggle to disable it for "mrexcel.com".
Go back

Disable uBlock Origin

Follow these easy steps to disable uBlock Origin

1)Click on the icon in the browser’s toolbar.
2)Click on the "Power" button.
3)Click on the "Refresh" button.
Go back

Disable uBlock

Follow these easy steps to disable uBlock

1)Click on the icon in the browser’s toolbar.
2)Click on the "Power" button.
3)Click on the "Refresh" button.
Go back
Back
Top