CPGDeveloper
Board Regular
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2008
- Messages
- 190
Happy Holidays Everyone --
Quick Question --
I have always understood that the best practice in employing a multi-user MS Access Application is to have a split database, with the back end residing on a shared server, and each individual user would have an executable .accde version of the front end on their individual desktops.
The first job I ever had using MS Access many years ago -- this was the setup, and I have always replicated it -- it's been suggested to me that it would be easier to simply have one copy of the Front End on the network that all users access -- from everything I can find that would create some performance and corruption issues...but are there are other reasons to deploy separate front ends for each user?
Quick Question --
I have always understood that the best practice in employing a multi-user MS Access Application is to have a split database, with the back end residing on a shared server, and each individual user would have an executable .accde version of the front end on their individual desktops.
The first job I ever had using MS Access many years ago -- this was the setup, and I have always replicated it -- it's been suggested to me that it would be easier to simply have one copy of the Front End on the network that all users access -- from everything I can find that would create some performance and corruption issues...but are there are other reasons to deploy separate front ends for each user?