bradleykus
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2019
- Messages
- 2
Hello,
I am no Excel master to any degree so I may be overlooking a really clear and obvious answer, but I'm trying to solve the following problem:
Basically all I'm doing is tracking a set of videos on a particular YouTube channel and what their projected viewcounts will be in the future. I then want the last video at the bottom of the list to have a data bar that tracks its progress to see how quickly/slowly it is catching up to the first video on the list (just chose the first one for demonstration).
As you can see in this first photo, it works fine; the conditional formatting shows the data bar in cell C14 properly filled up about a fifth of the way, showing that that video's 1,011,901 views are about a fifth of the top video's 4,741,156 views.
First photo: https://www.dropbox.com/s/9dp6vjkx296ien6/Excel 1.png?dl=0
Here is the rule set for that conditional formatting:
Second photo: https://www.dropbox.com/s/4mry0hz67qhn9dc/Excel 2.png?dl=0
Now, however, I want it to copy over for the rest of the spreadsheet, so that it is a running visual tracker as the viewcounts go up. I used the format painter to copy it over for the whole row, as you can see in the first photo above. What I then get is this:
Third Photo: https://www.dropbox.com/s/200ys8bect7jas2/Excel 3.png?dl=0
The data bar exists across the row in every cell (so that part's successful), but it is still referencing the first cell I chose (Cell C2) instead of the top cell in that column. That 3,668,361 in Cell AFI14 should only be about half filled when compared to the top cell in that column, 7,526,668. Here is what the conditional formatting is set to when I click on that cell.
Fourth Photo: https://www.dropbox.com/s/pvnpo8hqtipg68z/Excel 4.png?dl=0
Again, I know what it is doing - it's stacking up each cell against the original cell (C2), instead of using the new column's top cell each time. I thought using relative references would work but I guess conditional formatting doesn't allow the use of relative references - is there a workaround to this? Thank you!
I am no Excel master to any degree so I may be overlooking a really clear and obvious answer, but I'm trying to solve the following problem:
Basically all I'm doing is tracking a set of videos on a particular YouTube channel and what their projected viewcounts will be in the future. I then want the last video at the bottom of the list to have a data bar that tracks its progress to see how quickly/slowly it is catching up to the first video on the list (just chose the first one for demonstration).
As you can see in this first photo, it works fine; the conditional formatting shows the data bar in cell C14 properly filled up about a fifth of the way, showing that that video's 1,011,901 views are about a fifth of the top video's 4,741,156 views.
First photo: https://www.dropbox.com/s/9dp6vjkx296ien6/Excel 1.png?dl=0
Here is the rule set for that conditional formatting:
Second photo: https://www.dropbox.com/s/4mry0hz67qhn9dc/Excel 2.png?dl=0
Now, however, I want it to copy over for the rest of the spreadsheet, so that it is a running visual tracker as the viewcounts go up. I used the format painter to copy it over for the whole row, as you can see in the first photo above. What I then get is this:
Third Photo: https://www.dropbox.com/s/200ys8bect7jas2/Excel 3.png?dl=0
The data bar exists across the row in every cell (so that part's successful), but it is still referencing the first cell I chose (Cell C2) instead of the top cell in that column. That 3,668,361 in Cell AFI14 should only be about half filled when compared to the top cell in that column, 7,526,668. Here is what the conditional formatting is set to when I click on that cell.
Fourth Photo: https://www.dropbox.com/s/pvnpo8hqtipg68z/Excel 4.png?dl=0
Again, I know what it is doing - it's stacking up each cell against the original cell (C2), instead of using the new column's top cell each time. I thought using relative references would work but I guess conditional formatting doesn't allow the use of relative references - is there a workaround to this? Thank you!