Hyperpolymath
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2019
- Messages
- 1
I am using the statistics functions on Excel 2016, which have various items listed as 'compatibility functions', for instance, =mode and =stdev. I wanted to know, if I import an old spreadsheet:
1) Is there somewhere I can find out which of the new functions the deprecated ones refer to? For instance:
a) does =mode become (or act as) =mode.sing or =mode.mult
b) does =stdev become (or act as) =stdev.s or =stdev.p
2) Is there a way of converting all of the functions across the entire workbook/worksheet/in a range to one or the other reliably and automatically? I have spreadsheets that are very large and include functions AND text, so if I were to just do a 'find and replace' I risk changing text that says to users 'mode' to 'mode.mult' which is sort of helpful to me, but will confuse people. However, since they will assume that when I write 'mode' in text for their interpretation, I will always (for me) be talking about results that are =mode.mult or =stdev.s outputs it will be perfectly fine for them not to know the detail. Of course, I need to ensure that this is absolutely going to get it right behind the scenes too, so I don't want any errors on this correction, or it makes the output completely meaningless even though it will look fine!
Thanks so much!
Jonathan
1) Is there somewhere I can find out which of the new functions the deprecated ones refer to? For instance:
a) does =mode become (or act as) =mode.sing or =mode.mult
b) does =stdev become (or act as) =stdev.s or =stdev.p
2) Is there a way of converting all of the functions across the entire workbook/worksheet/in a range to one or the other reliably and automatically? I have spreadsheets that are very large and include functions AND text, so if I were to just do a 'find and replace' I risk changing text that says to users 'mode' to 'mode.mult' which is sort of helpful to me, but will confuse people. However, since they will assume that when I write 'mode' in text for their interpretation, I will always (for me) be talking about results that are =mode.mult or =stdev.s outputs it will be perfectly fine for them not to know the detail. Of course, I need to ensure that this is absolutely going to get it right behind the scenes too, so I don't want any errors on this correction, or it makes the output completely meaningless even though it will look fine!
Thanks so much!
Jonathan