Really hope you can help me on this.</SPAN>
</SPAN>
I`m using Excel 2013, I need to plug into another formula an array that differentiates hidden and visible rows (filtered and not filtered rows)
</SPAN></SPAN>
The way I was approaching this was creating a dummy column with the aggregate function like so:</SPAN>
</SPAN>
=aggregate(3,3,</SPAN> [@[any_other_column]]</SPAN>) </SPAN></SPAN>
The idea was this should`ve outputted 1s every time there was a visible row present and hidden rows output 0s. Then I would`ve used this dummy column of 1s and 0s as a reference for my main formula.</SPAN></SPAN>
But it`s not working! Some of the outputs in hidden rows (filtered rows) are 1s!! isn`t aggregate supposed to omit hidden rows? </SPAN></SPAN>data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0105d/0105d4d364e81077443e2ccf09dd58bb3b6a1efa" alt="Confused :confused: :confused:"
I`m sure it`s not working because when I sum up the entire dummy column I get a result of n+1 from the visible rows: e.g. I filter the table and obtain 5 visible rows, the sum of dummy column is 6. </SPAN></SPAN>
Ugggghh frustrating!? Mainly because sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn`t!</SPAN></SPAN>
Anybody know what`s going on? Or maybe you can give me another idea on how use other formulas that omit hidden or filtered cells. Thanks!!!
</SPAN></SPAN>
Anybody know what`s going on? </SPAN></SPAN></SPAN></SPAN></SPAN>
</SPAN>
I`m using Excel 2013, I need to plug into another formula an array that differentiates hidden and visible rows (filtered and not filtered rows)
</SPAN></SPAN>
The way I was approaching this was creating a dummy column with the aggregate function like so:</SPAN>
</SPAN>
=aggregate(3,3,</SPAN> [@[any_other_column]]</SPAN>) </SPAN></SPAN>
The idea was this should`ve outputted 1s every time there was a visible row present and hidden rows output 0s. Then I would`ve used this dummy column of 1s and 0s as a reference for my main formula.</SPAN></SPAN>
But it`s not working! Some of the outputs in hidden rows (filtered rows) are 1s!! isn`t aggregate supposed to omit hidden rows? </SPAN></SPAN>
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0105d/0105d4d364e81077443e2ccf09dd58bb3b6a1efa" alt="Confused :confused: :confused:"
I`m sure it`s not working because when I sum up the entire dummy column I get a result of n+1 from the visible rows: e.g. I filter the table and obtain 5 visible rows, the sum of dummy column is 6. </SPAN></SPAN>
Ugggghh frustrating!? Mainly because sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn`t!</SPAN></SPAN>
Anybody know what`s going on? Or maybe you can give me another idea on how use other formulas that omit hidden or filtered cells. Thanks!!!
</SPAN></SPAN>
Anybody know what`s going on? </SPAN></SPAN></SPAN></SPAN></SPAN>